House Of Fraser payment protection insurance (PPI), also known as loan repayment insurance, credit insurance or credit protection insurance was designed so that the borrower could make repayments to House Of Fraser if they were unable to earn income to service the debt. This shouldn't be confused with income protection insurance which is not usually attached to a debt. PPI was widely sold by House Of Fraser as an add-on to the loan or an overdraft product.
House Of Fraser PPI usually covered payments for a minimum of 12 months, this gave the borrower enough time to find alternative means of making repayments such as going back to work.
Some House Of Fraser PPI policies were sold without the consumer even aware that PPI was added onto their loan. Some consumers claim that House Of Fraser informed them that their application for a loan, credit card or mortgage would be declined if they didn't take out House Of Fraser payment protection insurance. In some cases this led to fear of losing a loan and the borrower would accept the House Of Fraser PPI even though they may not of even needed it.
House Of Fraser may have mis-sold you PPI if any of the below statements are relevant to you at the point of sale:
- Were you older than the upper age limit for your House Of Fraser PPI policy?
- If House Of Fraser had an upper age limit on the PPI policy and you were above this set age, you would not have been covered.
- Did House Of Fraser make you aware of any exclusions or circumstances in which you would not be eligible to make a claim?
- If you weren’t told by House Of Fraser about the exclusions, or circumstances in which you couldn’t claim, you may have been mis-sold your House Of Fraser PPI policy.
- Were you aware that House Of Fraser had added PPI to your agreement?
- If you were not aware PPI had been added to your agreement by House Of Fraser, it may have been added without your consent or it may have been opt-out box which was not obvious.
- Were you led to believe that the House Of Fraser PPI policy was compulsory to your finance agreement?
- If a PPI policy was required for the finance agreement, House Of Fraser should have made you aware that you had the right to shop around OR if you had pre-existing cover elsewhere, House Of Fraser should not have sold you another PPI policy.
- Was the total cost of the House Of Fraser PPI policy clearly explained to you at the point of sale?
- House Of Fraser should have explained every aspect of any costs relating to your PPI agreement. Failure to do so would be considered a big mis-selling factor.
- Did House Of Fraser make you aware that part of your PPI premiums may have been paid as commission?
- The Plevin ruling means that if over 50% of your PPI premiums were paid in commission to House Of Fraser, you were mis-sold and are due a PPI refund.
- Did you have a pre-existing medical condition at time you were sold your PPI policy by House Of Fraser?
- If you were ever unable to work throughout the term of your House Of Fraser PPI policy due to the pre-existing medical condition, you would not have been covered by the House Of Fraser PPI policy.
- Did House Of Fraser make you aware about cancelling your PPI policy?
- You should have been made aware by House Of Fraser that you had the right to cancel your PPI policy within the cooling off period.
- When you were sold your PPI policy by House Of Fraser, were you unemployed, self-employed or retired?
- If you were unemployed, self-employed or retired when House Of Fraser sold you your PPI policy, you would not have been covered and therefore the House Of Fraser PPI policy would have been of no benefit to you.
- Was the term of your House Of Fraser PPI cover shorter than the term of the finance agreement AND did House Of Fraser not explain that there would be a period of no PPI cover towards the end of your finance agreement?
- If House Of Fraser did not explain that you would be unprotected for any period of time throughout the finance agreement, you have been mis-sold your House Of Fraser PPI policy.
- Did House Of Fraser enquire if you had PPI cover elsewhere that would of covered repayments?
- House Of Fraser should have asked if you had pre-existing PPI cover elsewhere as this would have been sufficient.
- Did you feel pressured into purchasing the House Of Fraser PPI policy?
- A simple assessment of your personal circumstances to determine if PPI was of any benefit to you should have been carried out by House Of Fraser, with no pressure or hard selling.
If you have a successful PPI complaint against House Of Fraser upheld, you would be entitled to a full refund PPI paid to House Of Fraser, a full refund of any interest charged on the PPI by House Of Fraser and a compensation interest of 8% per annum on both of those combined.